Analyses of Aristotle (Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers) by Jaakko Hintikka

By Jaakko Hintikka

Aristotle considered his common sense and method as functions of the Socratic wondering strategy. specifically, common sense was once initially a examine of solutions necessitated via prior solutions. For Aristotle, thought-experiments have been actual experiments within the feel that through understanding varieties in one's brain, you can actually learn off their homes and interrelations. Treating varieties as self sufficient entities, knowable one after the other, dedicated Aristotle to his mode of syllogistic clarification. He didn't ponder lifestyles, predication and id as separate senses of estin. Aristotle therefore serves as an instance of a philosopher who didn't depend on the excellence among the allegedly diverse Fregean senses, thereby laying off new gentle on our personal conceptual presuppositions. This assortment includes numerous amazing interpretations that Jaakko Hintikka has recommend through the years, constituting a problem not just to Aristotelian students and historians of rules, yet to every body attracted to common sense, epistemology or metaphysics and of their historical past.

Show description

Read Online or Download Analyses of Aristotle (Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers) PDF

Similar logic & language books


While this booklet used to be initially released in 2006, Epistemetrics was once no longer as but a scholarly self-discipline. in regards to clinical details there has been the self-discipline of scientometrics, represented by way of a magazine of that very identify. technological know-how, despite the fact that, had a monopoly on wisdom. even though it is one in all our most vital cognitive assets, it isn't our just one.

The Paradox of Self-Amendment: A Study of Logic, Law, Omnipotence, and Change

The 1st full-length learn of self-reference and paradox in legislation, this ebook will intrigue and coach somebody drawn to legislation, common sense, philosophy, or political thought. background indicates that self-amendment - for instance, using a constitution's amending clause to amend itself - is average; criminal research indicates it to be lawful, no matter if (as a few logicians have alleged) it's self-contradictory; and philosophical research indicates it to be foundational for legality.

Against the Current: Selected Philosophical Papers

The current selection of seventeen papers, so much of them already released in overseas philosophical journals, offers either with matters within the philosophy of good judgment, the philosophy of arithmetic, the philosophy of language and epistemology. the 1st half includes serious tests and a little deviant renderings of the paintings of 2 seminal philosophers, Frege and Husserl, in addition to of the younger Carnap and Kripke.

Symbolic Logic An Introduction

This publication is meant either as a textbook in symbolic common sense for
undergraduate and graduate scholars and as a treatise on the founda-
tions of common sense. a lot of the fabric was once constructed in an under-
graduate path given for a few years in Yale college. The
course was once primarily a primary path in good judgment for college kids interested
in technological know-how. Many substitute units and strategies of presentation
were attempted. these integrated listed below are the ones that appeared most

Additional info for Analyses of Aristotle (Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers)

Example text

Aristotelian scholars have found the combination of different ideas in Aristotle’s distinction between different categories intensely puzzling. These different aspects of Aristotle’s theory include the following: 36 CHAPTER 2 (11) (i) Different questions one can ask about a given entity, and hence different question words (and certain related phrases) in a language. (Cf. Ockham (Loux), pp. 8–9; Ackrill, p. 79; Gomperz, p. ) Several scholars have argued on this basis that Aristotle’s distinction is firmly based on the structure of Greek (Trendelenburg, Benveniste, Kahn).

32. 33. 34. CHAPTER 1 Go´mez-Lobo, ‘‘The So-called Question of Existence,’’ 73. Posterior Analytics A 1, 71a24–7. Posterior Analytics A 1, 71a11–16. Cf. Posterior Analytics A 22, 84a36–7. Posterior Analytics A 10, 76b11–16. See Posterior Analytics B 3, 90b24–5; 13, 96b22–3; 17, 99a20–24. Posterior Analytics 76b5–6. Posterior Analytics 76b6–10. Posterior Analytics 76b6–10. See Prior Analytics A 25. See Ian Muller, Philosophy of Mathematics and the Deductive Structure in Euclid’s Elements (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1981 ), 38.

At the same time, Aristotle’s theory of definitions of different kinds is a vivid example of what was said earlier about the interrogative structure of Aristotelian epistemology and methodology. What has now been seen implies that there literally is no stage of our knowledge of a science (apud Aristotle) when we have reached all (and only) the first principles of a science so that all that is needed henceforth is merely to draw logical conclusions from them. For it was seen that before proper scientific conclusions can be drawn from atomic premises, they must receive an existential force by means of other syllogistic inferences from primary premises of a science.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.92 of 5 – based on 20 votes